We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Follow-up to #740.
We can keep a couple from the past (literally maybe just 2) as e.g. eth bridge may sometimes need to query prev epoch.
2
Setting as low prio for now as #1128 will have much more impact on the validator sets storage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this could be done with #1225
Sorry, something went wrong.
tzemanovic
karbyshev
brentstone
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Follow-up to #740.
We can keep a couple from the past (literally maybe just
2
) as e.g. eth bridge may sometimes need to query prev epoch.Setting as low prio for now as #1128 will have much more impact on the validator sets storage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: