You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In our testing environment, we saw a Disque node start to respond to HELLO with a response missing an IP address for its own node (it had neither 127.0.0.1 nor the local network IP - two interfaces available on this machine):
This confused the client I was using to no end. The client shouldn't try to use the HELLO information for a cluster of one node, but it was trying to anyway, and not expecting the missing IP.
Uptime on this disque node was 7 days, with very low load over that time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
OK, finally found the IP address for this node updated to 127.0.0.1 message upon connecting any other node.
So, it seems like this is expected behaviour: HELLO responses won't have an IP address for a node that hasn't met a cluster yet. I think that should probably be documented explicitly somewhere? I can then take that to the client maintainer and ask them to filter out HELLO responses with a missing IP address from consideration.
In our testing environment, we saw a Disque node start to respond to
HELLO
with a response missing an IP address for its own node (it had neither 127.0.0.1 nor the local network IP - two interfaces available on this machine):This confused the client I was using to no end. The client shouldn't try to use the HELLO information for a cluster of one node, but it was trying to anyway, and not expecting the missing IP.
Uptime on this disque node was 7 days, with very low load over that time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: