You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been finding this very disturbing for quite a while. I often work with splits and multiple buffers. In that kind of situations, the higlighting is very unintuitive: the inactive split buffers are much more emphasized (buffer name has a background color) than the active one (buffer name font color is set).
For instance :
What would be the best way to deal with this? Change the class used for highlighting? Make it a parameter? Any other idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hum. I'll have to try again, I did try to overwrite the colors and it did
not seem to work as I was expecting.
I'll give it another shot, this is not something I'm used to, I may have
done it wrong.
Okay I figured it out. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction @ap, I was almost there but messed up in my initial attempt to redefine the color groups. In case anyone is interested, I ended up with something like this :
hi link BufTabLineActive BufTabLineHidden
so that visible but inactive buffers are highlighted just like any other hidden buffer. Only the focused buffer is now highlighted differently.
Hey guys,
I've been finding this very disturbing for quite a while. I often work with splits and multiple buffers. In that kind of situations, the higlighting is very unintuitive: the inactive split buffers are much more emphasized (buffer name has a background color) than the active one (buffer name font color is set).
For instance :
What would be the best way to deal with this? Change the class used for highlighting? Make it a parameter? Any other idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: