Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Splits: non-focused split more highlighted than focused one #66

Closed
pabuisson opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Splits: non-focused split more highlighted than focused one #66

pabuisson opened this issue Feb 22, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@pabuisson
Copy link

Hey guys,

I've been finding this very disturbing for quite a while. I often work with splits and multiple buffers. In that kind of situations, the higlighting is very unintuitive: the inactive split buffers are much more emphasized (buffer name has a background color) than the active one (buffer name font color is set).

For instance :

capture d ecran 2019-02-22 a 11 49 41

What would be the best way to deal with this? Change the class used for highlighting? Make it a parameter? Any other idea?

@ap
Copy link
Owner

ap commented Feb 22, 2019

Does :help buftabline-colors leave you with further questions? 🙂

@pabuisson
Copy link
Author

pabuisson commented Feb 22, 2019 via email

@pabuisson
Copy link
Author

Okay I figured it out. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction @ap, I was almost there but messed up in my initial attempt to redefine the color groups. In case anyone is interested, I ended up with something like this :

hi link BufTabLineActive BufTabLineHidden

so that visible but inactive buffers are highlighted just like any other hidden buffer. Only the focused buffer is now highlighted differently.

@ap
Copy link
Owner

ap commented Feb 27, 2019

Ah, yeah, that makes sense for just removing the distinction altogether.

Glad you’re all set. 🙂

@ap ap closed this as completed Feb 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants