-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 336
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
discuss: New feature in Apache APISIX Ingress controller v1.6 #1309
Comments
|
thanks! SGTM This will help us expand the ecosystem |
Support multi cluster management should be helpful. |
@machinly Are you referring to managing multiple APISIX clusters through one APISIX Ingress controller? |
In fact, we will achieve the goal of managing multiple APISIX instances through one Ingress controller. We can dynamically state the APISIX instance simply by creating a |
The field |
v1.6.0-rc1 has been released. #1536 I will close this one. Thanks all!!! |
Hi, folks
The Apache APISIX Ingress controller v1.5 version has been entered release window, and it is time to discuss the plans in the v1.6 version together.
I think the following features need to be included:
Gateway API feat: GatewayAPI Support #644
Proposal: support external name service #927
feat: Support SNI based TLS Route #547
Proposal: Add support for APISIXPluginMetadata function #1372 Add suport for APISIX's plugin_metadata
Proposal: Apisix-Ingress-Controller support integrating with service discovery registry #1019 and feat: Support for 'discovery_type' in ApisixUpstream #948
proposal: use a uniform CRD APIVersion #707
feat: support k8s native ingress and backend service in the different namespace #1374
feature request: ApisixRoute resources use vars in Route #1376
Feature suggestion: support stream route with plugins #744
feat request: native MQTT Protocol proxy #966
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: