Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do not include runtime artefacts in operator image by default #486

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 25, 2019

Conversation

lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor

This PR removes the dependency between camel-k and camel-k-runtime as well a some re-factoring to the build set-up.

Some work is still needed so I definitively need someone to review and suggest cahnges

@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli added the status/wip Work in progress label Feb 22, 2019
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli changed the title do not include runtime artefacts in operator image by default #468 do not include runtime artefacts in operator image by default Feb 22, 2019
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli mentioned this pull request Feb 22, 2019
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@oscerd oscerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just a question: why the resources from runtime have version 1.0.0?

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

they should not have any version set but that's what the camel-k-maven-plugin does at the moment, I'm working on that

Copy link
Member

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds ok @lburgazzoli. Which part do you think needs an improvement? All pieces seems clearly separated now.

script/Makefile Outdated
BASE_IMAGE := fabric8/s2i-java:3.0-java8
LOCAL_REPOSITORY := /tmp/artifacts/m2
IMAGE_NAME := docker.io/apache/camel-k
RELEASE_GIT_BRANCH := upstream
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RELEASE_GIT_REMOTE?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fixed

@lburgazzoli
Copy link
Contributor Author

so let see how may thing we'll break

@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2019 13:26
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli removed the status/wip Work in progress label Feb 25, 2019
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli merged commit 2d9eda0 into apache:master Feb 25, 2019
@lburgazzoli lburgazzoli deleted the no-runtime branch February 25, 2019 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants