Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Enhancement] Supports dynamic configuration for EventMesh SDK used by the source/sink worker #4036

Open
1 of 2 tasks
xwm1992 opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

[Enhancement] Supports dynamic configuration for EventMesh SDK used by the source/sink worker #4036

xwm1992 opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@xwm1992
Copy link
Contributor

xwm1992 commented May 26, 2023

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Enhancement Request

Currently the eventmesh sdk used in the source/sink worker defaults to the tcp client, which needs to support dynamic configuration to decide which client to use.

Describe the solution you'd like

Currently the eventmesh sdk used in the source/sink worker defaults to the tcp client, which needs to support dynamic configuration to decide which client to use.

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@xwm1992 xwm1992 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 13, 2024
@apache apache deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 14, 2024
@Pil0tXia Pil0tXia added help wanted Extra attention is needed and removed Stale labels Apr 14, 2024
@Pil0tXia Pil0tXia mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2024
Open
25 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@xwm1992 @Pil0tXia