Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

HBASE-24165 maxPoolSize is logged incorrectly in ByteBufferPool #1483

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

HBASE-24165 maxPoolSize is logged incorrectly in ByteBufferPool #1483

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
7c52bb0
HBASE-24165 maxPoolSize is logged incorrectly in ByteBufferPool
pankaj72981 Apr 10, 2020
c22434b
HBASE-24165 maxPoolSize is logged incorrectly in ByteBufferPool
pankaj72981 Apr 11, 2020
dbbdbbc
HBASE-24165 maxPoolSize is logged incorrectly in ByteBufferPool
pankaj72981 Apr 16, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/io/ByteBufferPool.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -80,9 +80,9 @@ public ByteBufferPool(int bufferSize, int maxPoolSize, boolean directByteBuffer)
this.maxPoolSize = maxPoolSize;
this.directByteBuffer = directByteBuffer;
// TODO can add initialPoolSize config also and make those many BBs ready for use.
LOG.info("Created with bufferSize={} and maxPoolSize={}",
org.apache.hadoop.util.StringUtils.byteDesc(bufferSize),
org.apache.hadoop.util.StringUtils.byteDesc(maxPoolSize));
LOG.info("Created with bufferSize={}, maxPoolSize={} and totalBufferSize={}",
org.apache.hadoop.util.StringUtils.byteDesc(bufferSize), maxPoolSize,
org.apache.hadoop.util.StringUtils.byteDesc((long) (bufferSize * maxPoolSize)));
this.count = new AtomicInteger(0);
pankaj72981 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
}

Expand Down