Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] KAFKA-4677: Avoid unnecessary task movement across threads of the same process during rebalance #2411

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dguy
Copy link
Contributor

@dguy dguy commented Jan 20, 2017

No description provided.

@dguy
Copy link
Contributor Author

dguy commented Jan 20, 2017

@guozhangwang - i sent you a private message relating to this. Anyway, i thought i'd put what i've done this far here so you can have a look. You might have some other/better ideas on how we should go about it.
Currently if we had a scenario like so:
5 consumers, 3 active tasks, 3 standby tasks.
3 consumers each have 1 previous active task and 1 previous standby task.
2 consumers are new so have no previous tasks.
Then after the assignment the 2 new consumers would still have no tasks. But maybe we'd want to re-distribute the standby tasks across the 2 new consumers? I'm not sure. I'd welcome your thoughts.
Thanks

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jan 20, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-pr-jdk8-scala2.11/1072/
Test PASSed (JDK 8 and Scala 2.11).

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jan 20, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-pr-jdk8-scala2.12/1070/
Test PASSed (JDK 8 and Scala 2.12).

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jan 20, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-pr-jdk7-scala2.10/1070/
Test FAILed (JDK 7 and Scala 2.10).

@dguy dguy closed this Jan 23, 2017
@dguy dguy deleted the kstreams-446 branch February 17, 2017 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants