Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SOLR-14471: properly apply base replica ordering to last-place shards… #1507

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2020

Conversation

magibney
Copy link
Contributor

….preference matches

Copy link
Member

@tflobbe tflobbe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

// Add a PULL replica so that there's a tie for "last place"
replicas.add(
new Replica(
"node4",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

node5?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes; fixed, thanks for catching that!

@tflobbe tflobbe merged commit 54dca80 into apache:master May 15, 2020
tflobbe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
Properly apply base replica ordering to last-place shards.preference matches
tflobbe pushed a commit to tflobbe/lucene-solr-1 that referenced this pull request May 16, 2020
…che#1507)

Properly apply base replica ordering to last-place shards.preference matches
megancarey pushed a commit to megancarey/lucene-solr that referenced this pull request May 18, 2020
…che#1507)

Properly apply base replica ordering to last-place shards.preference matches
sigram pushed a commit to lucidworks/lucene-solr that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2020
…che#1507)

Properly apply base replica ordering to last-place shards.preference matches
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants