Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom to v2.16.1 #2135

Merged

Conversation

solrbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@solrbot solrbot commented Dec 8, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom dependencies minor 2.15.3 -> 2.16.1

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* * * * *" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot

@solrbot solrbot force-pushed the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson-jackson-bom-2.x branch 2 times, most recently from 53c27e3 to 059511b Compare December 8, 2023 15:47
@solrbot solrbot force-pushed the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson-jackson-bom-2.x branch from 059511b to c354652 Compare December 29, 2023 04:24
@solrbot solrbot changed the title Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom to v2.16.0 Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom to v2.16.1 Dec 29, 2023
@janhoy janhoy merged commit e9d0454 into apache:main Jan 3, 2024
2 checks passed
@solrbot solrbot deleted the renovate/com.fasterxml.jackson-jackson-bom-2.x branch January 3, 2024 20:28
janhoy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
janhoy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants