Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-13633] [SQL] Move things into catalyst.parser package #11506

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch simply moves things to existing package o.a.s.sql.catalyst.parser in an effort to reduce the size of the diff in #11048. This is conceptually the same as a recently merged patch #11482.

How was this patch tested?

Jenkins.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 4, 2016

Test build #52424 has finished for PR 11506 at commit ff61ab1.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 4, 2016

Test build #52428 has finished for PR 11506 at commit 5546725.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@hvanhovell
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, merging into master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b7d4147 Mar 4, 2016
@andrewor14 andrewor14 deleted the parser-package branch March 4, 2016 19:57
roygao94 pushed a commit to roygao94/spark that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch simply moves things to existing package `o.a.s.sql.catalyst.parser` in an effort to reduce the size of the diff in apache#11048. This is conceptually the same as a recently merged patch apache#11482.

## How was this patch tested?

Jenkins.

Author: Andrew Or <andrew@databricks.com>

Closes apache#11506 from andrewor14/parser-package.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants