Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

k8s部署apollo 接入ldap报错 #5140

Closed
zhao-jing-hui opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

k8s部署apollo 接入ldap报错 #5140

zhao-jing-hui opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@zhao-jing-hui
Copy link

configmap配置如下
image
k8s deployment挂载配置文件如下图
image
启动的时候active变量如下图
image
下面是报错内容,我已明确检查配置ldap的配置文件已经被挂载进去
image

Copy link

dosubot bot commented May 6, 2024

The error you're encountering, related to a duplicate bean definition named 'applicationTaskExecutor', typically occurs due to conflicting bean definitions within the Spring context. This can happen when there are overlapping configurations, especially when multiple profiles are active, such as github and ldap in your case. Here's how to address the issue:

  1. Check for Manual Bean Definitions: Look through your configuration files and Java config classes for any manually defined TaskExecutor beans. If an applicationTaskExecutor is defined, consider renaming it or leveraging Spring Boot's default task executor instead.

  2. Examine Profile-Specific Configurations: Ensure there are no conflicting bean definitions across the profiles you're using. This includes reviewing configurations related to the github profile, which might be contributing to the issue.

  3. Use Conditional Bean Definitions: Apply the @ConditionalOnMissingBean annotation to your custom bean definitions to prevent conflicts with Spring Boot's auto-configured beans.

  4. Rely on Spring Boot Defaults: If your application doesn't specifically require a custom TaskExecutor, it's best to use the one auto-configured by Spring Boot to avoid such conflicts.

  5. Enable Debug Logging: To get a clearer picture of why the conflict occurs, enable debug logging for Spring's bean loading and condition evaluation processes. This can help identify the root cause of the duplicate bean definition.

  6. Review Apollo Configuration: Make sure that the LDAP integration or any other Apollo-specific configuration does not introduce a conflicting bean definition.

If these steps do not resolve the issue, providing more details about your configurations and any customizations to Apollo's default behavior could be helpful. Specifically, examining the Apollo authentication configurations and any related customizations might offer further insights.

Details

Sources


About Dosu
This response is meant to be useful and save you time. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research.

Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant.

To continue the conversation, mention @dosu.

Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 8, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in 7 days unless it is tagged "help wanted" or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jun 8, 2024
@nobodyiam
Copy link
Member

可以看下具体的报错信息,截图中的信息不够明确

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jun 10, 2024
@ltx0633
Copy link

ltx0633 commented Jun 17, 2024

可以看下具体的报错信息,截图中的信息还不够明确

image

我遇到了同样的错误,这是细节

@zhao-jing-hui
Copy link
Author

zhao-jing-hui commented Jun 17, 2024

可以查看具体的报错信息,截图中的信息还不够明确

图像 我遇到了同样的错误,这是

这个问题我已经解决了,根据此问题修改对应的代码,重新编译生成jar包替换即可。
https://github.com/apolloconfig/apollo/pull/5055/files

Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 20, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in 7 days unless it is tagged "help wanted" or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 20, 2024
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 27, 2024

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 7 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as "help wanted". Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants