chore(docs): update comparison table

[knqyf263]

Changes

• Convert "Good" to "Not bad" (we converted △ to "Good" for clarification, but I originally meant "not so good, not so bad".)
• Remove MicroScanner
• Convert "Not present" to "Not good" in DockerHub

Issue

#587 (comment)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #623 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #623   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.84%   54.84%           
=======================================
  Files          48       48           
  Lines        2299     2299           
=======================================
  Hits         1261     1261           
  Misses        908      908           
  Partials      130      130           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d8b0962...074c17a. Read the comment docs.

[AkihiroSuda]

LGTM

Another way might be using star symbols:

• ◎ → ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
• ○ → ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
• △ → ⭐ ⭐
• × → ⭐

[knqyf263]

It sounds nice. What do you think, @lizrice?

[lizrice]

Yes, there are definitely some issues with the wording currently. "Good" means better than "OK", but I'm not sure that's what is intended in this table? And "not good" and "not bad" are very ambiguous terms (it's unclear whether they are better or worse than "OK"!)

I think that for the first two columns, OS packages and App dependencies, it's a yes/no question of whether they are supported or not? In which case how about

• supported →✅
• not supported → ×

And then for the other three columns, I'd suggest

• ◎ (best) → ⭐ ⭐ ⭐
• ○ → ⭐ ⭐
• △ → ⭐
• × (not supported) → ×

[knqyf263]

@lizrice Thanks. I've updated it.

[lizrice]

lgtm