We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With help from @zackgalbreath and @jeffbaumes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am planning soon to share the JSON serialization format that workflow engine uses (which is close to Zack & Jeff's design) then compare with the spec Zack has up already here: https://github.com/arborworkflows/ProjectManager/wiki/analysis-&-workflow-schema
Sorry, something went wrong.
Shared sample analyses format for discussion this week with @zackgalbreath and @jeffbaumes.
With advent of Romanescu workflows, seems like we are going back to "name" from "@name" and abandoning the worklfow system through Visomics for now.
it is all working. marking as resolved.
curtislisle
No branches or pull requests
With help from @zackgalbreath and @jeffbaumes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: