You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The documentation states that the new setNoticeXX functions return the previous notice receiver or processor, but the C code (bindings) returns nothing (0). Also, you do not release the previous lock set with luaL_ref if the functions are called again. There are no luaL_unref calls in the code.
I am using your bindings in an environment where the setNoticeXX functions do not work and deadlocks the solution. I would appreciate it if you can add code for optionally removing these two functions by using ifdefs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The documentation states that the new setNoticeXX functions return the previous notice receiver or processor, but the C code (bindings) returns nothing (0). Also, you do not release the previous lock set with luaL_ref if the functions are called again. There are no luaL_unref calls in the code.
I am using your bindings in an environment where the setNoticeXX functions do not work and deadlocks the solution. I would appreciate it if you can add code for optionally removing these two functions by using ifdefs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: