Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CliArgumentsTest.java:36-38: Add more tests for... #205

Closed
0pdd opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 7 comments
Closed

CliArgumentsTest.java:36-38: Add more tests for... #205

0pdd opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented May 26, 2020

The puzzle 113-cf87a1eb from #113 has to be resolved:

* @todo #113:30min Add more tests for CliArgumentTests.
* Add tests for CliArguments using all arguments, '=' signal for setting
* argument values and longopt name arguments.

The puzzle was created by paulodamaso on 25-May-20.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented May 26, 2020

@g4s8/z please, pay attention to this issue

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented May 29, 2020

The job #205 assigned to @marceloamadeu/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@marceloamadeu
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat status

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 2, 2020

@0crat status (here)

@marceloamadeu This is what I know about this job in CT2E6TK9B, as in §32:

g4s8 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 2, 2020
#205 - Add more tests for CliArgumentTests
@0pdd 0pdd closed this as completed Jun 2, 2020
@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jun 2, 2020

The puzzle 113-cf87a1eb has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0crat 0crat added qa and removed scope labels Jun 2, 2020
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 2, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @marceloamadeu/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat added quality/good and removed qa labels Jun 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants