Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NodeHasPkgCount.java:34-39: This matcher should also... #307

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

NodeHasPkgCount.java:34-39: This matcher should also... #307

0pdd opened this issue Jun 30, 2020 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Jun 30, 2020

The puzzle 285-b9db6ed3 from #285 has to be resolved:

* @todo #285:30min This matcher should also verify that `packages` attribute of metadata files
* has correct value of packages (the same as packages count). Add this check, correct mismatch
* description to say how many packages was found, what is `packages` attribute value and what is
* expected. The tests are already implemented, so enable them after implementing. After that
* use this matcher in `RpmTest`, `RpmITCase` and possibly in ModifiableMetadataTest and
* MetadataFileTest.

The puzzle was created by paulodamaso on 25-Jun-20.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

0pdd referenced this issue Jun 30, 2020
For #285: verify package attribute on NodeHasPkgCount
@olenagerasimova olenagerasimova self-assigned this Jun 30, 2020
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 30, 2020

@g4s8/z, @olenagerasimova/z please, pay attention to this issue

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 30, 2020

The job #307 assigned to @olenagerasimova/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

olenagerasimova referenced this issue in olenagerasimova/rpm-adapter Jun 30, 2020
olenagerasimova referenced this issue in olenagerasimova/rpm-adapter Jun 30, 2020
olenagerasimova referenced this issue in olenagerasimova/rpm-adapter Jun 30, 2020
olenagerasimova referenced this issue in olenagerasimova/rpm-adapter Jun 30, 2020
@olenagerasimova olenagerasimova added this to the Week 27 milestone Jun 30, 2020
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jun 30, 2020

There is an unrecoverable failure on my side. Please, submit it here:

PID: 4@8366e303-9dc5-4679-a29a-c61b61f06cfb, thread: PQ-CT2E6TK9B
com.jcabi.xml.StrictXML[124] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: 2 error(s) in XML document: -1:-1: cvc-pattern-valid: Value 'gh:Week 27' is not facet-valid with respect to pattern '[a-z]{2}:[A-Z0-9a-z.\-#/]+' for type 'milestoneID'.;-1:-1: cvc-complex-type.2.2: Element 'successor' must have no element [children], and the value must be valid.

0.53.15: CID: bfe8ff0c-4b85-4ac5-928a-ddc10b20b5ca, Type: "Job milestoned"

olenagerasimova added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2020
#307 - NodeHasPkgCount fully implemented
@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jul 2, 2020

The puzzle 285-b9db6ed3 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jul 2, 2020

@0pdd 2 puzzles #310, #311 are still not solved.

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 2, 2020

Job was finished in 44 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Jul 2, 2020
@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jul 3, 2020

@0pdd 3 puzzles #310, #316, #317 are still not solved; solved: #311.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Sep 10, 2020

@0pdd 3 puzzles #310, #359, #360 are still not solved; solved: #311, #316, #317.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Oct 27, 2020

@0pdd 2 puzzles #310, #360 are still not solved; solved: #311, #316, #317, #359.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jan 10, 2022

@0pdd the puzzle #360 is still not solved; solved: #310, #311, #316, #317, #359.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants