Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FilePackage.java:113-115: Create unit tests to verify... #75

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 24 comments
Closed

FilePackage.java:113-115: Create unit tests to verify... #75

0pdd opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 24 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Apr 8, 2020

The puzzle 69-3c6bbf6c from #69 has to be resolved:

* @todo #69:30min Create unit tests to verify that
* FilePackage headers can parse headers and header range correctly,
* can calculate file size and check-sums correctly.

The puzzle was created by @g4s8 on 08-Apr-20.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 8, 2020

@g4s8/z please, pay attention to this issue

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 9, 2020

The job #75 assigned to @carlosmiranda/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 14, 2020

@carlosmiranda/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

@carlosmiranda
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 15, 2020

@0crat refuse (here)

@carlosmiranda The user @carlosmiranda/z resigned from #75, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 24, 2020

The job #75 assigned to @ammaratef45/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@ammaratef45
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 24, 2020

@0crat refuse (here)

@ammaratef45 The user @ammaratef45/z resigned from #75, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 24, 2020

@0crat refuse (here)

@ammaratef45 Job refused in 19 hours - no penalty, see §6

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 24, 2020

The job #75 assigned to @HDouss/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@HDouss
Copy link
Contributor

HDouss commented Apr 24, 2020

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 24, 2020

@0crat refuse (here)

@HDouss The user @HDouss/z resigned from #75, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 24, 2020

@0crat refuse (here)

@HDouss Job refused in 0 hours - no penalty, see §6

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 25, 2020

The job #75 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

victornoel commented Apr 26, 2020

@g4s8 I have two questions on this task:

  • what is the meaning of testing size or checksum when it corresponds to copypasting the content of the checksum and size method in a test file? Aren't there more useful things to do? Maybe testing directly FilePackage would make more sense, no?
  • what is header range? I don't see anything related to that in the class or interface behaviour my bad, I missed it, anyway, same question as above...

@g4s8
Copy link
Member

g4s8 commented Apr 27, 2020

@victornoel yes, your suggestions makes sense. This ticket is about verifying metadata parsing from RPM packages and increase coverage for that, since this part is one of the most central point in the logic.

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat wait for #152 to be merged

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@g4s8 see #152, I added a todo there to convey this intention :)

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Apr 29, 2020

The puzzle 69-3c6bbf6c has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Apr 29, 2020

@0pdd 2 puzzles #154, #155 are still not solved.

@0crat 0crat added qa and removed waiting scope labels Apr 29, 2020
@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Apr 29, 2020

@sereshqua/z please review this job completed by @victornoel/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@sereshqua
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@0crat 0crat added quality/good and removed qa labels Apr 29, 2020
@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented May 20, 2020

@0pdd the puzzle #154 is still not solved; solved: #155.

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jun 30, 2020

@0pdd all 2 puzzles are solved here: #154, #155.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants