-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove references to sensor_msgs::PointCloud #332
Conversation
- Use sensor_msgs::PointCloud2 instead of sensor_msgs::PointCloud.
@at-wat any idea why this happened? https://travis-ci.org/github/at-wat/mcl_3dl/jobs/716918432#L3455 |
It's a bug in the latest version in gh-pr-comment. I'm going to fix it. |
No rush. Thanks!. Let me know if there is anything I can help with. |
[#833] PASSED on noeticTested on Alpine ROS [#833] PASSED on kineticAll tests passed
[#833] PASSED on melodicAll tests passed
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #332 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.52% 94.57% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 32 32
Lines 1716 1713 -3
==========================================
- Hits 1622 1620 -2
+ Misses 94 93 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
It does not look like the use of
sensor_msgs::PointCloud
is necessary. For consistency, usingsensor_msgs::PointCloud2
seems better.