Fix usage of hasXXX(), it now return bool only

[mvorisek]

in future, hasField might be introduced back but to return strictly bool value as expected, but it is no BC break now and will not be later - tryGetField will remain

[georgehristov]

$row->get($field) should also work even if $field is a \atk4\data\Field. Any reason to change this?

[mvorisek]

@georgehristov $row->get($field) is was unified to accept only string field name at least for now - only a few uses, I make these decisions not only on "what is expected", but also on data, ie. "how this is usually used"

[georgehristov]

I really don't like the direction of stripping down the versatility...

[mvorisek]

I really don't like the direction of stripping down the versatility...

I may seem so - but compare how many uses are "correct/canonical" and how many are like to be fixed - it is more than 100:1. Without the data, I would say probably the say the same as you...

Let's get this merged.

If you prefer array access like model access, getting values by field objects, you made extend the data Model and use it within your projects as you like.

But in lib, we need more standardized types and workflows, so everyone can understand it and the hidden bugs are discovered (for ex. mixed types of "current_row" and more than 10 others issues).