Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

De-fuglify with Bootstrap #20

Closed
dustinboston opened this issue Jun 1, 2012 · 5 comments
Closed

De-fuglify with Bootstrap #20

dustinboston opened this issue Jun 1, 2012 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@dustinboston
Copy link
Contributor

Update HTML/CSS to use Bootstrap. @addyosmani Shall we integrate LESS and use the build step to generate the .css files? Or do you just want to stick with the pre-baked versions from le Twitter?

@sindresorhus
Copy link
Contributor

It's not clear from the readme how Aura is supposed to be used. Is it meant as a starting point or as an inspiration?

If it's meant as a starting point, I think LESS would be great to quickly set up the dev.

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member

I see Aura as a starting point. It was originally supposed to be nothing more than a reference implementation, but I think it's getting to a point where we can do a lot more with it. I would be happy for us to switch to using LESS if we're going to opt for Bootstrap on the visual styles front.

@gersongoulart
Copy link
Contributor

These should all be plugins. I think Aura should be clean and small, only containing what is absolutely necessary to the JS web application structure. Than every person using it can choose if it wants to work with html5boilerplate, Twitter Bootstrap, Foundation, LESS, SASS, etc.

@addyosmani
Copy link
Member

I see this project offering people a base (Aura) and a demonstration of how it can be extended to work with, say Backbone (via the demo app). We could if we really wanted to specifically offer the extensions directory that cover Backbone up as a component and make that even more clearly separated from the demo app. Thoughts?

@gersongoulart
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, you got it. That's exactly what I meant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants