You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2022. It is now read-only.
Recently I was searching for a simple way to add autocomplete to a textarea in some proprietary maintenance application of my company. The application will be used internally by a handful of users. smart-area seems to perfectly fit my needs, but unfortunately it's a JavaScript library licensed under (A)GPLv3.
Using GPLv3 for JavaScript libraries is an ongoing discussion and it's generally considered a bad idea to use it for JS-libs [citation needed].
My question is: was it intentionally to use exactly this license, or would LGPLv3 be a better choice?
Another thing is, that the license definition in the package.json is wrong. It should be "AGPL-3.0" not "AGPL-V3" (see https://spdx.org/licenses/). Webjars refuses to generate a .jar from the lib because of this.
Hi,
Recently I was searching for a simple way to add autocomplete to a textarea in some proprietary maintenance application of my company. The application will be used internally by a handful of users. smart-area seems to perfectly fit my needs, but unfortunately it's a JavaScript library licensed under (A)GPLv3.
Using GPLv3 for JavaScript libraries is an ongoing discussion and it's generally considered a bad idea to use it for JS-libs [citation needed].
My question is: was it intentionally to use exactly this license, or would LGPLv3 be a better choice?
Another thing is, that the license definition in the package.json is wrong. It should be "AGPL-3.0" not "AGPL-V3" (see https://spdx.org/licenses/). Webjars refuses to generate a .jar from the lib because of this.
References for the [citation needed]:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1239470/restrictions-of-gpl-on-javascript-libraries
http://greendrake.info/#nfy0
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/javascript-trap.html
...
Thanks for considering,
Manfred
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: