Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Taskonomy dataset loading #166

Open
Rufaim opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Taskonomy dataset loading #166

Rufaim opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Rufaim
Copy link
Contributor

Rufaim commented Feb 27, 2023

Hello,
Can you help me with downloading and loading Taskonomy dataset data?

Download script only fetches raw pixel pngs, "class_object" labels and "class_scene" labels. That only covers "autoencoder", "class_object", "class_scene" and "jigsaw" tasks. I've found that "normal" task labels can also be downloaded from downloads.cs.stanford.edu similarly to "class_object". That makes 5 out of 7 in total. How to get "room_layout" and "segmentsemantic" tasks?

When loading TaskonomyDataset it requires some json containing template paths. In loading configs (like here) they are marked as "final5K_splits".
How do i generate those files? I can not seem to find any scripts related to this.

@AnaRisnoveanu
Copy link

Segmentation worked for me using "segment_semantic".

@f4nku4n
Copy link

f4nku4n commented Jul 6, 2024

download.txt. Here is the script I use to download the data for TNB101. There's one note for segmentsemantic task, you need to rename folder segment_semantic to segmentsemantic.

If you clone repo in the default branch (i.e., Develop), you need to change line 17 in taskonomy_dataset.py:
'room_layout': ('room_layout', 'npy') -> 'room_layout': ('point_info', 'json')

You can figure out the folder 'final_5Ksplits' here. I also suggest you clone three folders in taskonomydata_mini.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants