-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add NATS Autopilot Pattern #1
Conversation
YES!!!! What are the plans for seneca and NATS? |
@sberryman no direct plans for seneca-nats, but happy to help if you have plans. |
@geek, honestly today is the first I've heard of NATS and just got done watching Derek Collison's talk on it. My biggest problem right now with seneca is the req/res assumption; this is also not the right place to be discussing seneca. Either way, it would be interesting to hear how you guys are using NATS. I'm currently using seneca with rabbitmq as the messaging layer. I tried to go with SWIM but it was easier for me to hack together observers on top of rabbitmq topic exchanges. |
@sberryman I like the idea of using NATS in the same way you would use rabbitmq with seneca today. Another actor model solution that uses NATS is hemera. There is a publish only mechanism in seneca, if you don't expect a response... |
Any idea when you are going to merge this? I ended up getting a few of my old colleagues at Golf Channel on the NATS bandwagon after seeing you post this. I'm also seriously considering a quick attempt at a seneca transport. RMQ is overkill for what I need right now. |
@sberryman very cool. I am hoping to have this merged and published tomorrow. How does this PR look to you, anything that you would like to see? |
bin/manage.sh
Outdated
#!/bin/bash | ||
|
||
consulCommand() { | ||
consul-cli --quiet --consul="${CONSUL}:8500" $* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's this getting us that we don't already have from the consul
binary in the container?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tgross good catch, I removed in favor of consul members
docker pull $(image):$(tag) | ||
|
||
$(DOCKER_CERT_PATH)/key.pub: | ||
ssh-keygen -y -f $(DOCKER_CERT_PATH)/key.pem > $(DOCKER_CERT_PATH)/key.pub |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should try setting up the test job on Jenkins... I'm fairly certain we don't need this here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tgross I will do that, I was hoping to get an initial version out to be able to have the tests fully working
No description provided.