Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ID with other wing from Patrick #93

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2019
Merged

ID with other wing from Patrick #93

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2019

Conversation

avikde
Copy link
Owner

@avikde avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

Related to #89

@avikde
Copy link
Owner Author

avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

Seems like some sign is wrong at first glance -0.323622 22.6338 0.737315 0.105319 0.506726

image

Compare to the other wing's plots

image

@avikde
Copy link
Owner Author

avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

Stroke sign was wrong 2.71162 25.542 0.399987 2.37176 3.0698

image

@avikde
Copy link
Owner Author

avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

Comparing to the prior result isn't working since I can't replicate the prior result well right now

@avikde
Copy link
Owner Author

avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

At home (laptop)

julia> using Pkg

julia> Pkg.installed()
Dict{String,Union{Nothing, VersionNumber}} with 17 entries:
  "RigidBodyDynamics"      => v"2.1.0"
  "ForwardDiff"            => v"0.10.3"
  "Revise"                 => v"2.1.6"
  "BenchmarkTools"         => v"0.4.2"
  "JuMP"                   => v"0.19.2"
  "DSP"                    => v"0.6.0"
  "OSQP"                   => v"0.5.2"
  "TrajectoryOptimization" => v"0.1.0"
  "Ipopt"                  => v"0.5.4"
  "PyCall"                 => v"1.91.2"
  "MAT"                    => v"0.6.0"
  "Dierckx"                => v"0.4.1"
  "Plots"                  => v"0.26.0"
  "ProgressMeter"          => v"1.0.0"
  "StaticArrays"           => v"0.11.0"
  "DifferentialEquations"  => v"6.6.0"
  "PositiveFactorizations" => v"0.2.2"

In lab (desktop)

  "RigidBodyDynamics"      => v"2.1.0"
  "ForwardDiff"            => v"0.10.3"
  "Revise"                 => v"2.1.6"
  "BenchmarkTools"         => v"0.4.2"
  "Interpolations"         => v"0.12.2"
  "CodeTracking"           => v"0.5.7"
  "DSP"                    => v"0.6.0"
  "OSQP"                   => v"0.5.2"
  "Ipopt"                  => v"0.5.4"
  "BandedMatrices"         => v"0.10.1"
  "MAT"                    => v"0.6.0"
  "Dierckx"                => v"0.4.1"
  "OrdinaryDiffEq"         => v"5.14.0"
  "Plots"                  => v"0.26.0"
  "PyPlot"                 => v"2.8.2"
  "ProgressMeter"          => v"1.0.0"
  "StaticArrays"           => v"0.11.0"
  "DifferentialEquations"  => v"6.6.0"
  "PositiveFactorizations" => v"0.2.2"
  "Parameters"             => v"0.11.0"
  "Requires"               => v"0.5.2"

Left wing

3.26326 29.6996 0.476355 4.69271 4.21278

image

Right wing

ID result for other wing 2.72547 26.4608 0.39059 2.41643 3.08962

image

@avikde
Copy link
Owner Author

avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

conclusion: reveals much lower stiffness for right vs. left (2.4 vs 4.6). it also thinks that the left wing has higher chord length (3.26 vs. 2.72) and higher T (29 vs 26). Some of these probably have very similar costs since the cost landscape might be somewhat flat especially for a single flap, but it did reveal the lower stiffness of the right wing

@avikde
Copy link
Owner Author

avikde commented Oct 29, 2019

unfortunately patrick's left wing produced more lift. possible causes are:

  • wing torsion is causing errors
  • wing not taut - seems impossible

@avikde avikde merged commit c19a3dc into master Oct 29, 2019
@avikde avikde deleted the id-other-wing branch October 29, 2019 23:15
@avikde avikde mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2019
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant