Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

training and validation #29

Open
basbaba opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

training and validation #29

basbaba opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@basbaba
Copy link

basbaba commented Apr 3, 2023

I downloaded the source code and nuscene data(mini version, provided by the Author) as README.txt told, after training 1000 epochs:

  1. if set data_size = 0.2, the val_loss.txt will always be around 35
  2. if set data_size - 0.7 the val_loss.txt will always be around 20

whatever the value of data_size is, any input image will get an nonsense output. I tried several different images(from nuscene or mine) but the result images look similar. I have no ideal where is the problem.

So have anyone succeeded in training a model to get a good result?

@basbaba basbaba changed the title training and validate training and validation Apr 4, 2023
@basbaba
Copy link
Author

basbaba commented Apr 8, 2023

Update:

Now I'm moving to full nuscenes dataset instead of mini, the result looks better, the edges of generated area are sharpen and solid than mono-semeantic-maps.
But the speed of training is touching: 200 epoch will cost 330 days with my nvidia T4.
I'll try to improve it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant