Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Device type -i instead of -e #6

Closed
gjkunde opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Device type -i instead of -e #6

gjkunde opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@gjkunde
Copy link

gjkunde commented Dec 1, 2020

Hello,

I am trying to use new v2 bdfs in the Vitis chain with Vivado 2020.3 in 18.04 LTD, importing my work from Vivado 2018.3:

I get a device type mismatch because the pdf is specifying the -i not the -e in previous files, I
hacked that but there is still the complaint about locked ip and bus width changes with respect
to v2 1.0 ..

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated, thank you

@zedman2000
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there, you will want to access the support forums on Element 14.
https://www.element14.com/community/community/designcenter/zedboardcommunity/zedboard-forums/ultra96-hardware-design-forum
And as a parting gift, some basic information:
The I vs E is intentional. We updated the BDF to target the I grade as we now sell an I grade part and you can build I grade and use it on E grade. You typically will get exactly that behavior when importing a design. It is generally good practice to rebuild the design using TCL in the new tools - which is what we support in our repository, otherwise you have to go into each IP and update them.

Also, do you mean the 2020.2 tools? 2020.3 is not out at this time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants