-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 423
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add worth-reading CSS books #115
Comments
@Rishabh04-02 Wasn't my PR Fair enough to serve the purpose? Later on, with course of time enhancements could have been done 😞 |
@jaykay12 I've requested the maintainers that we need a discussions platform, once they respond to it then we can have a discussions there regarding the issues, queries and the development of awesome-css. |
@jaykay12 We are sorry to feel bad. Recently I have invited members but I do not have rules. @Rishabh04-02 What about to create rules for maintainers and first rules will be "We need 2 people approval when we merge PRs" What do you think? |
@sotayamashita This 2 people rule is good 👍 , i agree with it. |
@sotayamashita Its totally cool man! @Rishabh04-02 what do you say? |
Sorry if my comments in the pull request seem harsh. I'm not sure whether it is better to require two approvals as it also means double the work. In my opinion it is enough to ping other contributors to comment if a pull request is controversial. If a request is closed or merged, you can always step into the discussion (and reopen the request) if you disagree.
@jaykay12 sure. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Apparently, Some people like reading books more than watching videos, So, I propose to add few names of good reference books for learning CSS as currently this particular aspect is missing in the Awesome CSS. 😊
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: