Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I think a recent update broke it #6

Open
sborn opened this issue May 10, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

I think a recent update broke it #6

sborn opened this issue May 10, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@sborn
Copy link

sborn commented May 10, 2022

I had this running as a service and it worked flawlessly. Now, the iOS devices are suddenly seeing the IP as the IP of the Raspberry Pi that it is running on. Do you have any thoughts about it?

So server.js is running, sending out packets, and the iOS app is seeing the IP of the server rather than of the UNVR from the packet.

I did notice that the packet changed when I ran client.js, but I updated them.

Here is what I get when I run it manually:
got message from 192.168.10.240:49893 successfully sent 146 bytes got message from 192.168.10.240:49893 got message from 192.168.10.240:50816 got message from 192.168.10.240:59979 successfully sent 146 bytes successfully sent 146 bytes successfully sent 146 bytes got message from 192.168.10.240:49893 successfully sent 146 bytes got message from 192.168.10.240:50816 successfully sent 146 bytes got message from 192.168.10.240:59979 successfully sent 146 bytes got message from 192.168.10.240:59979 got message from 192.168.10.240:49893 got message from 192.168.10.240:50816 successfully sent 146 bytes successfully sent 146 bytes successfully sent 146 bytes

@adams-family
Copy link

@sborn Hi, were you able to resolve this issue?

@sborn
Copy link
Author

sborn commented Dec 31, 2022

@sborn Hi, were you able to resolve this issue?

I didn't. I think a Ubiquiti update eliminated the need for it, though. Is that not the case?

@adams-family
Copy link

@sborn Ubiquity update seems to have eliminated the option to connect to Protect from a different VLAN/VPN completely, according to some posts of other folks :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants