You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first of all, thank you for your port of gocryptfs in windows.
Can you explain why reverse mode fileystems are always mounted read-only ? For backup it is perfectly fine, but what about synchronization with a sync client ? For example two different computers where files are stored unencrypted which sync through a cloud where files are stored encrypted ? Any modification on one side should propagate to the other. Moreover, most of sync clients needs to have write access to store a local journal of the sync process inside the sync directory.
Is it inherent to the program ? Is it not possible to allow to bypass this default option of read-only to give write access ?
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a gocryptfs limitation. Currently there is no support for RW reverse and with the current AES-SIV implementation even if there was support for writes, you would not be able to sync files with it since the encryption is non-deterministic.
Thanks bailey, it would really be great to have such an option. By now I will keep encfs which provide RW support for reverse mode, even if I know that it has some security holes.
Hi bailey27,
first of all, thank you for your port of gocryptfs in windows.
Can you explain why reverse mode fileystems are always mounted read-only ? For backup it is perfectly fine, but what about synchronization with a sync client ? For example two different computers where files are stored unencrypted which sync through a cloud where files are stored encrypted ? Any modification on one side should propagate to the other. Moreover, most of sync clients needs to have write access to store a local journal of the sync process inside the sync directory.
Is it inherent to the program ? Is it not possible to allow to bypass this default option of read-only to give write access ?
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: