You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @melhashash, thank you for your interest. The quickest modification to get the exact number of points is to request more points than you originally need with a reasonable tolerance (for an algorithm to converge) and then apply TopN filtering to select the exact number of points you need. Since you will be doing TopN on already homogeneously distributed points on the image, you will still maintain that property. Additional, TopN complexity is linear with respect to the filtered number of points (sorted in decreasing order of strength at this stage) and is not a bottleneck.
Thanks for the work.
I can get the exact number of returned points using
brownANMS
, but using other methods, I couldn't, even when I set thetolerance
to0
.Is there a quick modification to get the exact number of points for the other methods?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: