Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please give proper attribution - your project is a packaged version of a stackoverflow.com answer of mine. #1

Closed
mklement0 opened this issue Feb 12, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@mklement0
Copy link

As I've said in a comment on my stackoverflow.com answer where you got the code from:

It's great that you've packaged it for npm, but you need to give proper attribution:

  • mention the source in README.md
  • add me to the contributors key in package.json

If this were a one-liner, I wouldn't ask for this, but given that the entire functionality of your package is my code verbatim, and the contents of your read-me are the comments from my code verbatim, I think it's only fair that you publicly acknowledge where it came from.

@mklement0
Copy link
Author

I was hoping that my informal request for attribution would be enough, but just in case you're unaware of the legal situation:

As noted in the Stack Exchange Terms of Service and in the footer of every page, all user contributions are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike. Proper attribution is required if you republish any Stack Exchange content.

http://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing

If I don't hear from you in the coming days, I will report you for abuse.

@mklement0
Copy link
Author

I have just filed a DCMA takedown request. You can learn about the process here.

@caseyWebb
Copy link

jfc... I get it, but damn.

@mklement0, @barsh is/was on vacation. I'll submit a PR before you have an aneurysm, but more importantly break our build process.

@mklement0
Copy link
Author

Hey, thanks for letting me know.

Just to be clear: I want the repository to remain in place, and I think it's great that @barsh packaged it up, as I've stated.

I do, however, think that just republishing other people's work verbatim without attribution is not acceptable, and since I hadn't received any feedback in 11 days I decided to take action.

But if that's getting resolved now, that's great.

I'm asking this innocently (I'm really interested in the answer): how long would you have waited?

@barsh
Copy link
Owner

barsh commented Feb 23, 2016

I was out of the country... this is my first day back, but I get so many messages from Github that I might have overlooked this anyway. I have made the requested changes. As @caseyWebb suggested, feel free to submit a pull request if you want more cred.

@barsh barsh closed this as completed Feb 23, 2016
@mklement0
Copy link
Author

I'm glad to hear that this was just a case of crossed wires - thanks for fixing the problem. As I've stated in my response on stackoverflow.com, I am glad that you took the time to package up my code for easy reuse via npm.

@Qix-
Copy link

Qix- commented Feb 26, 2017

@mklement0 Lol, seriously though. You wrote 5 generic SLOC on Stack Overflow and DMCA'd him over it due to no responses in a week or so. Just pointing out a bit of absurdity with that.

@mklement0
Copy link
Author

@Qix- You've read the exchange. You know what happened. You've made yourself feel superior. I respectfully opt out of this conversation you're having with yourself.

@Qix-
Copy link

Qix- commented Feb 26, 2017

@mklement0 Mmk. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants