You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I exported taxonomy information at the Class level using MEGAN, and there were 1306 contigs assigned to Mammalia. I used those 1306 sequences to re-run above scripts and only 97.6% of the 1306 sequences were assigned to Mammalia. This is not expected as I expected 100% of the 1306 sequences were assigned to Mammalia.
Then, I set --masking 0 and run the analyses again.
I used Diamond and MEGAN to assign taxonomy for my contigs.
I exported taxonomy information at the Class level using MEGAN, and there were 1306 contigs assigned to Mammalia. I used those 1306 sequences to re-run above scripts and only 97.6% of the 1306 sequences were assigned to Mammalia. This is not expected as I expected 100% of the 1306 sequences were assigned to Mammalia.
Then, I set --masking 0 and run the analyses again.
I used the contigs assigned to Mammalia to re-run the above scripts, only 82.2% sequences were assigned to Mammalia.
I am wondering what caused the inconsistency and what parameters can be used to increase the consistency for the results from different runs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: