You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am testing the dilithium (ML-DSA) signatures using bcprov version 1.77, and find out that the signatures of dilithium3 and dilithium5 have different size than NIST FIPS 204 (Draft), published August 24, 2023 (available under https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204.ipd), "Table 2. Sizes (in bytes) of keys and signatures of ML-DSA.".
Bouncycastle (dilithium3) : 3309 bytes vs FIPS 204 (ML-DSA-65): 3293 bytes
Bouncycastle (dilithium5) : 4627 bytes vs FIPS 204 (ML-DSA-87): 4595 bytes.
Note on the intermediate values for ML-DSA:
We recognize that Table 2 of the draft FIPS 204 gives incorrect values for the sizes of the signature and private key.
I am testing the dilithium (ML-DSA) signatures using bcprov version 1.77, and find out that the signatures of dilithium3 and dilithium5 have different size than NIST FIPS 204 (Draft), published August 24, 2023 (available under https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204.ipd), "Table 2. Sizes (in bytes) of keys and signatures of ML-DSA.".
Bouncycastle (dilithium3) : 3309 bytes vs FIPS 204 (ML-DSA-65): 3293 bytes
Bouncycastle (dilithium5) : 4627 bytes vs FIPS 204 (ML-DSA-87): 4595 bytes.
Below is the code to reproduce the result:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: