Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BVAL-508 Second round with both alternatives #23

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

BVAL-508 Second round with both alternatives #23

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Commits on Feb 4, 2016

  1. BVAL-508 Initial proposal: support for contained value constraints

    @emmanuelbernard
    emmanuelbernard committed Feb 4, 2016
    Copy the full SHA
    f413bce View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. BVAL-508 Adding alternative proposal

    @gunnarmorling @emmanuelbernard
    gunnarmorling authored and emmanuelbernard committed Feb 4, 2016
    Copy the full SHA
    23bcc40 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Feb 9, 2016

  1. BVL-508 Improve proposal 1 

    * address remarks from the PR
* cover Map<@notempty String, @min(5) Integer>
** introduce notion of container + value type tuple for a given
extractor and `@ExtractedValue`
* detail refinements necessary for @Valid on type_use
    @emmanuelbernard
    emmanuelbernard committed Feb 9, 2016
    Copy the full SHA
    191cac4 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. BVAL-508 Add new proposal on Extractor alternative

    @emmanuelbernard
    emmanuelbernard committed Feb 9, 2016
    Copy the full SHA
    92a1100 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  3. Add type use term to Glossary

    @emmanuelbernard
    emmanuelbernard committed Feb 9, 2016
    Copy the full SHA
    90cf69c View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history