Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there official support/no support for Sets? #721

Open
antonytrupe opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Is there official support/no support for Sets? #721

antonytrupe opened this issue Nov 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@antonytrupe
Copy link
Contributor

I swear I read before something about Sets not working, but I'm striking out finding it again. Is it supposed to handle Sets, or is that out of scope currently? It looks like it saves them as empty objects.

@Belphemur
Copy link
Owner

Currently, it doesn't support Set, Map etc ...

For that we'd need to write/update the custom json serializer and deserializer to support those type

@antonytrupe
Copy link
Contributor Author

antonytrupe commented Nov 20, 2023

Right, of course. Is that something that fits in the design goals for this project, or not so much?

I'm currently using arrays/objects in the db and then converting them as as they cross the memory/store boundary, which doesn't seem wrong.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants