You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Basically the syntax seen in the "Fizz Buzz" example, or the example given in the FAQ, but parseable by the interpreter. It would need the following features:
Interpreter flag to read file contents instead of timestamps
Interpreter flag to export file contents to a series of files modified timestamps
Ability to write comments inline without affecting the interpreter
Currently using the : character in documentation, but open to suggestion for
something different
(optional) Ability for the interpreter to reverse this process, including comments
i.e. Give the interpreter a list of regular Y2K files, read their timestamps, and output
a "raw.y2k" file with inline comments.
Basically the syntax seen in the "Fizz Buzz" example, or the example given in the FAQ, but parseable by the interpreter. It would need the following features:
:
character in documentation, but open to suggestion forsomething different
a "raw.y2k" file with inline comments.
The basic process should work like the following:
1 - Write a "raw.y2k" file
2 - Test functionality with raw file
$ y2k -raw raw.y2k Hello World!
3 - Convert raw file to regular Y2K files with their timestamps modified
4 - Verify functionality of the newly created regular Y2K files
This would make editing much easier, but also allow exporting for scenarios where proof of a 0-byte solution is needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: