You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When running the following commands:
./LaBGen-OF-cli -i input/ -o output/dis_flow.png -a dis_flow -p 1 -n 3 -s 10 -t 2 -r record/dis_flow.avi 1
./LaBGen-OF-cli -i input/ -o output/sparse_to_dense.png -a sparse_to_dense -p 1 -n 6 -s 10 -t 3 -r record/sparse_to_dense.avi 1
The resulting output image is identical if the set of input images were identical too. I have tested this on a large dataset, with all the optical flow implementations provided in this repository. Behavior is only observed between dis_flow and sparse_to_dense.
Note, in the recording it is observed that the vector field, optical flow (hsv) and segmentation map are vastly different. It are merely the output images that are identical.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When running the following commands:
./LaBGen-OF-cli -i input/ -o output/dis_flow.png -a dis_flow -p 1 -n 3 -s 10 -t 2 -r record/dis_flow.avi 1
./LaBGen-OF-cli -i input/ -o output/sparse_to_dense.png -a sparse_to_dense -p 1 -n 6 -s 10 -t 3 -r record/sparse_to_dense.avi 1
The resulting output image is identical if the set of input images were identical too. I have tested this on a large dataset, with all the optical flow implementations provided in this repository. Behavior is only observed between
dis_flow
andsparse_to_dense
.Note, in the recording it is observed that the vector field, optical flow (hsv) and segmentation map are vastly different. It are merely the output images that are identical.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: