Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add new symbols to max7456_symbols.h (#8138)
Add new symbols to max7456_symbols.h
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
23 additions
and
17 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9554415
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mikeller When you get the time. Can you look over the BB log code. I have never used the log capacity on the OSD before. So i'm not sure if the issue is related to the changes here, or it was a previous issue.
The log capacity does not increase. It is just staying a Zero. But when checked in the configurator. The log memory has been used.
Thanks
9554415
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Jetrell: Can you please specify what you mean by 'log capacity'?
9554415
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The number stays at Zero. And does not increase.
9554415
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's not the capacity, that's the log file number. If you are logging into a flash chip it will stay at 0.
9554415
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahhh...Thanks for that. I am using a flash chip in this case. That explains it. Sorry for the false alarm :-)