Assessment for principle 17

[tamberg]

[LDN meeting] re https://github.com/openiotmark/iotmark-principles/tree/v20180309#17-the-organisation-must-be-explicit-as-to-the-expected-duration-of-terms-of-service

This principle could be combined with the one underneath

A "best before" statement?

need to update data governance to define this wording needs to be clear about explaining consequences of any change of use

Check that online and/or packaging presence of the device includes statements or labelling system that makes clear what duration of the terms of service is.

[tamberg]

Not sure "Terms of Service" is the right term here. I think the original intention was something like "for how long the (backend) service is provided" in the sense of an SLA.

[tamberg]

Proposed rewording of principle:

The vendor MUST make explicit for how long the connected product is expected to work.

[tamberg]

Proposed rewording of assessment:

Assessment: The vendor submits links to user documentation stating the expected service life of the connected product.

[tamberg]

Oops, guess I confused this principle with https://github.com/openiotmark/iotmark-principles/tree/develop#28-the-vendor-must-be-clear-about-the-expected-lifetime-of-the-service-provided-by-the-device-and-backend

[tamberg]

Fixed https://github.com/openiotmark/iotmark-principles/tree/develop#17-the-vendor-must-make-explicit-the-expected-duration-of-the-terms-of-service