New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Eliminate unused ConcreteADAMRDDFunctions class #1580
Comments
4 tasks
@fnothaft move to 0.25.0? |
I think this is keep in 0.24.0, but let me confirm. |
fnothaft
pushed a commit
to fnothaft/adam
that referenced
this issue
Feb 21, 2018
Resolves bigdatagenomics#1580. Does not compile due to abstract classes not implemented.
5 tasks
fnothaft
pushed a commit
to fnothaft/adam
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2018
Resolves bigdatagenomics#1580. Does not compile due to abstract classes not implemented.
fnothaft
pushed a commit
to fnothaft/adam
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2018
Resolves bigdatagenomics#1580. Does not compile due to abstract classes not implemented.
fnothaft
pushed a commit
to fnothaft/adam
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2018
Resolves bigdatagenomics#1580. Does not compile due to abstract classes not implemented.
fnothaft
pushed a commit
to fnothaft/adam
that referenced
this issue
Mar 15, 2018
Resolves bigdatagenomics#1580. Does not compile due to abstract classes not implemented.
heuermh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 20, 2018
Resolves #1580. Does not compile due to abstract classes not implemented.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was considering doing this in #1391, as it would eliminate the classtag hacking I've added in 92e296e. However, I don't want this to come in to #1391, because I'd rather it get a standalone review, etc. Here's the to-do:
T: Manifest
, which eliminates the need to hack the classtagsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: