New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

moved bdgenomics.adam package to bdgenomics-adam #1705

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
4 participants
@akmorrow13
Contributor

akmorrow13 commented Aug 30, 2017

No description provided.

@akmorrow13

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@akmorrow13

akmorrow13 Aug 30, 2017

Contributor

addresses #1691

Contributor

akmorrow13 commented Aug 30, 2017

addresses #1691

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Aug 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.593% when pulling 677241a on akmorrow13:update-python-module into 511f925 on bigdatagenomics:master.

coveralls commented Aug 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.593% when pulling 677241a on akmorrow13:update-python-module into 511f925 on bigdatagenomics:master.

@AmplabJenkins

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@AmplabJenkins

AmplabJenkins Aug 30, 2017

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/2347/
Test PASSed.

AmplabJenkins commented Aug 30, 2017

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/2347/
Test PASSed.

@akmorrow13 akmorrow13 referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2017

Merged

Mango python #307

1 of 2 tasks complete
@heuermh

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heuermh

heuermh Sep 5, 2017

Member

Can we close this in favor of #1706? Even though that PR is currently failing Jenkins, it looks like the better approach.

Member

heuermh commented Sep 5, 2017

Can we close this in favor of #1706? Even though that PR is currently failing Jenkins, it looks like the better approach.

@akmorrow13

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@akmorrow13

akmorrow13 Sep 5, 2017

Contributor

Yes I can close

Contributor

akmorrow13 commented Sep 5, 2017

Yes I can close

@akmorrow13 akmorrow13 closed this Sep 5, 2017

@heuermh heuermh added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Dec 7, 2017

@heuermh heuermh added this to Completed in Release 0.23.0 Jan 4, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment