You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The nova list has V407 Cyg classified as ZAND. However, the system showed a classical nova eruption in 2010 (becoming the first gamma-ray detected nova https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Sci...329..817A/abstract ). The nova-host system is indeed a symbiotic binary containing a Mira red giant donor and the white dwarf primary. However, the 2010 eruption was fast, typical for a classical rather than symbiotic (ZAND) novae. The 2010 event was a classical nova eruption in a symbiotic binary system (the terminology is, admittedly, confusing).
I suggest to add "NB:" to classification of V407 Cyg to indicate that it is actually a confirmed classical nova rather than a ZAND symbiotic nova, so it shows up as one after screening the list for confirmed novae. Maybe ZAND can be kept as a secondary classification as the nature of the 1936 event is uncertain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Kirill - thanks for the suggestions on this. As you may know, I am working well outside my area of expertise here, so the help is very useful to me.
From your description, it sounds as if "NB:/ZAND" would be a good way to go. Annoyingly, the column field width is one byte too short for that. I dislike ignoring bits of information just to pack everything into the field, but will probably have to do that. Extending the field would break a lot of code that currently processes that list.
I'd think we could classify it as "NB:", and then change galnovae.err to remove this comment :
V407 Cyg re-erupted 2010 Mar 10.
to say, instead (borrowing from your comment),
V407 is a symbiotic binary (Mira red giant donating to a white
dwarf primary). It had a classical nova eruption on 2010 Mar 10. See
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Sci...329..817A/abstract
The nova list has V407 Cyg classified as ZAND. However, the system showed a classical nova eruption in 2010 (becoming the first gamma-ray detected nova https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Sci...329..817A/abstract ). The nova-host system is indeed a symbiotic binary containing a Mira red giant donor and the white dwarf primary. However, the 2010 eruption was fast, typical for a classical rather than symbiotic (ZAND) novae. The 2010 event was a classical nova eruption in a symbiotic binary system (the terminology is, admittedly, confusing).
The current version of GCVS lists the classification as "M+NB:" http://www.sai.msu.su/gcvs/cgi-bin/search2.cgi?search=V407+Cyg
It is unknown what was the nature of the 1936 outburst: was it a ZAND outburst or just a maximum of the Mira.
The VSX classifies V407 Cyg as NR+ZAND+M https://www.aavso.org/vsx/index.php?view=detail.top&oid=11327
The "R" = "recurrent" seems unjustified to me, as there is only one confirmed nova eruption in this system - the one in 2010.
I suggest to add "NB:" to classification of V407 Cyg to indicate that it is actually a confirmed classical nova rather than a ZAND symbiotic nova, so it shows up as one after screening the list for confirmed novae. Maybe ZAND can be kept as a secondary classification as the nature of the 1936 event is uncertain.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: