You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, we just pass a single transform object in. This is inconvenient if we want different transforms for train, test, and val, as mentioned in #25.
Potential Solutions:
Rename the transform parameter to transforms and treat it as a dictionary instead. We can then split it within fetch_segmented_dataloaders . We would also want to update our tests to reflect this change + cover the edge case where the transforms parameter is either None or {}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature Request
Description of Problem:
Right now, we just pass a single transform object in. This is inconvenient if we want different transforms for
train
,test
, andval
, as mentioned in #25.Potential Solutions:
Rename the
transform
parameter totransforms
and treat it as a dictionary instead. We can then split it withinfetch_segmented_dataloaders
. We would also want to update our tests to reflect this change + cover the edge case where thetransforms
parameter is eitherNone
or{}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: