-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Would it be possible in the future to use other ontologies in addition to EDAM #216
Comments
Hi @bayjan I would be very interested to know what ontology / ontologies do you have in mind? Also, if you think some concept is missing from the EDAM ontology you can always request to have it added at: Thank you, |
Hi @hansioan Thank you for your quick response. Actually I wanted to add some machine learning related concepts to some multiomics-related tools at bio.tools; however, such concepts needs to be present in EDAM or as you suggested it needs to be added. Someone had already opened an issue regarding some of these concepts and I asked about the status of that issue and @matuskalas from EDAM ontology re-opened that issue edamontology/edamontology#360, which is also related to this issue: edamontology/edam-bioimaging#17. So, I think some concepts will already be there and hopefully others can be added soon to EDAM, because direct transfer from other ontologies can be somewhat complicated. Here are a few concepts out of many I am planning to add:
Actually concepts like |
Hi @bayjan So adding some of the concepts in EDAM would be enough in your case? So no need for another ontology? |
All what you mentioned is modelled as separate concepts in EDAM Bioimaging, and as such will be merged into the main EDAM in due course. |
Thanks, that is a very good news. So, I need to wait for the next EDAM release. Meanwhile I will check for the presence of all my concepts at WebProtégé for EDAM Bioimaging live version. I hope it is fine if I close this issue if all the concepts I want are already there at the EDAM Bioimaging live version. |
Would it be possible in the future to use other ontologies in addition to EDAM in annotating tools at bio.tools? This is necessary if a given term is not present in EDAM. Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: