Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to emphasize input requirements #197

Open
fernandomeyer opened this issue Dec 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Need to emphasize input requirements #197

fernandomeyer opened this issue Dec 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@fernandomeyer
Copy link

The fact that assembler bioboxes require interleaved fastq input should be emphasized. There’s just one brief sentence mentioning this in the bioboxes website documentation, and it can be easily overlooked.

@pbelmann pbelmann added this to the 7./14. February Meeting milestone Jan 25, 2017
@michaelbarton
Copy link
Contributor

I believe the solutions to this are:

  • change the biobox-file-validator to return an error message if the short_read_fastq file is not gzipped and interleaved.
  • Add additional documentation to RFC
  • Possibly add an additional page about expected input formats to website.

If these seems reasonable we can create an issue for each.

@pbelmann pbelmann self-assigned this Mar 3, 2017
@pbelmann
Copy link
Member

  • change the biobox-file-validator to return an error message if the short_read_fastq file is not gzipped
  • change the biobox-file-validator to return a warning message if the short_read_fastq file does not seem to be interleaved. (it will check for common naming patterns for ids. However there is no standard as far as I know )
  • Add additional documentation to RFC
  • Possibly add an additional page about expected input formats to website.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants