Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestions: layered selections #741

Open
FranckLejzerowicz opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Suggestions: layered selections #741

FranckLejzerowicz opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@FranckLejzerowicz
Copy link

Hi EMPeror lord,

For biplots, it would be great to be able to subset visualization items based on multiple criteria, for example: first remove features' arrows for e.g. "taxon level 1" and then e.g. ">10" in sample prevalence.

This would help one willing to bypass the limitation of being restricted to the top 5-rank arrows and have the possibility to subset using a combination of criteria.

--> You did propose a "categories merging" feature that would allow selecting based on two or more metadata merged "on the fly". Yet I think this could be tedious since the number of factors in the merged column could explose rapidly.

The way I do this currently is to show all the arrows using the "--p-number-of-features" options set to the number of features and then subset using a metadata column tailored for my needs - or editing the ordination.txt to only keep the arrows I want.

One way I see around woulda be to allow a default start with no arrow and then removing using a first metadata factor, then being able to add another dropdown menu, then removing using a second metadata factor from this additional menu, etc... Just like for the wonderful "HivePanelExplorer":
https://github.com/hallamlab/HivePanelExplorer/wiki/Hive-Panel-Explorer-Beginner's-Guide#exploring-your-hive-panel-1

Also, could a "Visibility" selection be based on numeric threshold? (I'm gonna raise another issue as this is seperate I guess).

Thanks!
F

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants