Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KGML files #155

Closed
wants to merge 27 commits into from
Closed

KGML files #155

wants to merge 27 commits into from

Conversation

widdowquinn
Copy link
Contributor

As we discussed - not an ideal pull request (rebasing added the recent Biopython changes to the KEGG branch, rather than what was expected), but if it's workable, here's the code in a way that doesn't seem to break Biopython ;)

L.

widdowquinn and others added 27 commits February 2, 2013 17:08
First addition of Bio.KGML module, with Bio.Graphics.KGML_vis and unit
test in Bio.Tests.
Split single KGML test to online, graphics, and nographics tests. Moved
Bio.KGML to Bio.KEGG.KGML.
There are still TODOs when drawing relations as arrows. This ability is
commented out for now.
Removed *stupidly* committed files
Also removes Bio.ParserSupport.SGMLStrippingConsumer
i.e. This change makes the deprecated aliases read only, and adds an
explicit warning when reading the values. Previously only got a warning
on setting the value via the deprecated alias.
No code changes, don't need TravisCI to test this: [ci skip]
@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Apr 3, 2013

Cleaned up branch here - squashing Leighton's commits into one (getting rid of the confusion of the accidentally added then removed files) on the current master:
https://github.com/peterjc/biopython/commits/kegg

We need to review this in conjunction with @kevin's KEGG API work:
#152

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Apr 4, 2013

I've updated the Git ignore listing which would have prevented your accidental check in of the biopython.egg-info files - so that was a useful mistake:
0b80de4

@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Apr 4, 2013

We can continue discussion on this pull request based on the cleaned up branch:
#173

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants