Adopt the OBF Code of Conduct

[peterjc]

• I hereby agree to dual licence this and any previous contributions under both
  the Biopython License Agreement AND the BSD 3-Clause License.

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.rst file, have run pre-commit
  locally, and understand that continuous integration checks will be used to
  confirm the Biopython unit tests and style checks pass with these changes.

• I have added my name to the alphabetical contributors listings in the files
  NEWS.rst and CONTRIB.rst as part of this pull request, am listed
  already, or do not wish to be listed. (This acknowledgement is optional.)

See:

• https://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2019-November/016730.html
• https://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2021-May/016869.html
• https://www.open-bio.org/2021/05/12/request-for-comments-on-coc-draft/
• Create CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md OBF/obf-docs#78
• https://www.open-bio.org/2022/01/27/approved-by-obf-membership-vote/

Note that to match the other Biopython top level text files I have used CODE_OF_CONDUCT.rst rather than CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md as suggested by GitHub: https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/adding-a-code-of-conduct-to-your-project

[peterjc]

Posted to the mailing list too:

https://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2022-February/016930.html

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3866 (546de26) into master (4d37d81) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3866   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.29%   84.29%           
=======================================
  Files         322      322           
  Lines       55044    55044           
=======================================
  Hits        46400    46400           
  Misses       8644     8644           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d37d81...546de26. Read the comment docs.

[peterjc]

Cross reference bioperl/bioperl-live#366 for BioPerl

[JoaoRodrigues]

Nothing to add to the text itself. My only comment would be that it would be nice to have the actual CoC file on our repository, but I see the advantages of having it centralized in the OBF repo and then linked to (updates, etc).

[peterjc]

Yes, having the text directly in the Biopython repository would be nice, but then we need a mechanism to keep it in sync with the central copy. A short human readable file directing readers to the central copy seemed best.

[peterjc]

There were no further comments on the mailing list either since https://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython/2022-April/016934.html