Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

increased test coverage for Bio.SeqRecord and other fixes #638

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Oct 15, 2015
Merged

increased test coverage for Bio.SeqRecord and other fixes #638

merged 5 commits into from Oct 15, 2015

Conversation

carlosp420
Copy link
Contributor

such as typos and usage of format method with the !r conversion in Bio.SeqRecord.
Coverage increased from 54% to 90%.

@peterjc peterjc merged commit 6ad86a6 into biopython:master Oct 15, 2015
@peterjc
Copy link
Member

peterjc commented Oct 15, 2015

Unless anyone objects, I'm OK with requiring unittest2 like this under Python 2.6 to get all the tests to run: http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/biopython-dev/2015-October/021090.html

Thanks Carlos.

@carlosp420 carlosp420 deleted the patch-36 branch October 24, 2015 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@carlosp420 @peterjc